NKU's SACS Reaffirmation Process: 2006 - 2009
 

Compliance Committee Guidelines
 
NKU's SACS Reaffirmation Main Page

 
SACS Manuals, Forms & Reference Materials
 

Compliance Certification
 
  Evaluating Compliance
 
  Faculty Credentials
 
  Toolkit for Program Effectiveness
(Assessment plans)

 
  Toolkit for Alignment Planning
(Strategic Plans)

 
Compliance Committees
 
  Academic Programs & Support
 
  Communication with Constituencies
 
  Faculty Credentials & Responsibilities
 
  Finance & Resources
 
  Governance & Administration
 
  Planning & Assessment
 
  Student Policies & Services

NKU Office of Curriculum, Accreditation & Assessment
 

 
 
Seven committees have been formed to conduct the self-studies necessary to complete the Compliance Certification portion of the SACS reaffirmation process. Each committee has been assigned a different set of Core Requirements, Comprehensive Standards, and Federal Requirements on which to focus, and all of their analyses should be completed by the end of spring semester 2008.

  

Members of each committee are responsible for:

  • carefully analyzing and interpreting each Core Requirement, Comprehensive Standard, and Federal Requirement assigned to their committee;
  • determining and stating in one or two words the extent to which NKU is in compliance, partial compliance, or non-compliance with each standard;
  • gathering, organizing, and submitting high-quality, appropriate evidence to support and explain whatever determination of compliance is made;
  • preparing an outline or rough draft of the committee’s conclusion about each standard, the evidence available to support it, and a narrative explanation.

 
 
Compliance committees are not expected to write the final report or even “their sections” of it. Instead, the Compliance Certification will be written by one person to ensure that it has a single, clear voice and is consistent throughout in style, tone, and tenor. Committees are, however, expected to:

  • provide the writer/editor with all necessary information and documentation to write the report, and
  • review drafts of the report for accuracy with respect to the standards they were assigned.

 
 
For additional information:

This link to excerpts from the "Compliance Certification" portion of the SACS’s Handbook for Reaffirmation of Accreditation provides a brief but authoritative overview of the Compliance Certification process to guide committee discussions and deliberations.

Committee members may also find it helpful to review Appendix C: Examples of Narratives for the Compliance Certification in The Handbook for Reaffirmation of Accreditation. It provides several samples of the types of reasoning and evidence that are expected in the compliance document. It's available online in pdf format, and Appendix C begins on page 47.

 
 

Site Maintained by:
Office of Curriculum, Accreditation, and Assessment
Northern Kentucky University
Phone: 859-572-6124
lepperm@nku.edu

Compliance Certification requires that the institution demonstrate that it has based its compliance decisions on compelling and appropriately documented evidence.

SACS Handbook for Reaffirmation of Accreditation

Faculty Coordinator for SACS Reaffirmation:
Douglas Reimondo Robertson, Ph.D.
Assistant Provost and Professor Steely Library,
Suite 220
Voice: 859-572-1354 Fax: 859-572-1387
robertsond2@nku.edu http://pod.nku.edu